Dissertation committees reject literature reviews for structural issues, not just typos. Our AI-powered checker identifies synthesis gaps, citation problems, and scholarly voice issues that cause revision requests.
Built from 10,552 chair revision notes · Results in under 60 seconds
After writing 10,552 revision notes as a dissertation chair, the same issues kept causing delays:
One of the most common revision requests: listing sources chronologically without connecting them to a thesis or each other.
Overconfident claims, missing hedging, and unsupported assertions signal a writer who hasn't mastered academic discourse.
Format errors, missing years, and inconsistent citation patterns are easy to miss but hard for committees to overlook.
Our checker runs targeted checks optimized for Chapter 2 / Literature Review formatting, structure, and scholarly quality.
Select 'Literature Review' mode and upload your Chapter 2. We accept .docx files up to 50MB.
In under 60 seconds, receive a detailed report with every issue location and specific fix suggestions.
Work through issues systematically. Mark items as done and track your progress to 100% compliance.
Check your literature review before your committee does. Find issues in 60 seconds, not 60 days of revision cycles.
Check Your Literature Review Free